Best marketing automation tools for 2026
Make, Zapier, and GoHighLevel compared for small teams: real 2026 pricing, where each fits, and the automation traps that cost money.

Some links below are partner links. If you buy through one, The Memo earns a commission at no extra cost to you. How we make money.
In this briefing
- How we picked
- Make: visual workflows at the lowest entry price
- Zapier: fastest setup for common app connections
- GoHighLevel: automation inside the customer system
- The plan sheets in detail
- What the meters count, precisely
- A worked example: 500 leads a month
- AI steps: the new budget line
- When the connector becomes the system
- Who should skip each one
- Three budgets, mapped
- Your move
- The reliability habit that outranks the tool choice
- How we checked
- Worth watching
- FAQ
For most small teams in 2026, Make is the automation platform to compare first if you want low-cost workflows across your tools. Zapier is easier when you need fast setup across common apps. GoHighLevel is different: it fits when automation has to live beside your customer list, text follow-up, booking calendar, and sales pipeline. The wrong choice does not just waste a subscription. It hides broken follow-up until leads go cold.
How we picked
Marketing automation means software that moves routine work between tools without a person doing each step. Example: a form comes in, the lead is added to your customer list, a text goes out, and a staff task is created.
We judged these by the jobs a small operator needs: lead capture, follow-up, internal alerts, simple AI steps, and readable customer data. Pricing comes from official plan pages, checked July 2026.
| Make | Zapier | GoHighLevel | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry paid price | $9/mo at 5,000 credits | $19.99/mo starting price | $97/mo Starter |
| Free allowance | 1,000 credits/mo | 100 tasks/mo | No free plan |
| Meter | Credits | Tasks | Subscription plus usage |
| Best fit | Visual workflows across apps | Fast app connections | Service-business follow-up |
| Watch-out | Credit math can surprise you | Task count climbs fast | Setup takes patience |
Make: visual workflows at the lowest entry price
Make is the cleanest fit when your work crosses several apps and you want to see the path on screen. The workflow is called a scenario, and each module action, such as reading a record or adding a row, usually uses one credit. Its official pricing page shows a free plan with 1,000 credits a month and the Make plan at $9/month for 5,000 credits.
That price is the appeal. A small team can connect forms, spreadsheets, email tools, calendars, AI prompts, and reporting sheets without jumping straight into a larger bill. Make also gives you routers and filters, which are simple rules that send work down different paths.
The catch is planning. A five-step workflow that runs 1,000 times can burn 5,000 credits. If you automate noisy events, like every website visit or every tiny contact update, the cheap plan stops feeling cheap.
Zapier: fastest setup for common app connections
Zapier is still the easiest answer when the job is ordinary and speed matters. Its official pricing page lists a free plan with 100 tasks a month and Professional starting at $19.99/month. A task is a completed unit of work. Zapier says standard app actions usually count as one task, while some AI and routing actions cost more.
The app library is the reason people stay. Zapier says it connects across more than 9,000 apps, which matters when your stack includes a form tool, email platform, CRM, spreadsheet, and a few one-off services. The editor is plain enough for a non-technical owner to inspect.
The trade-off is cost at volume. A lead workflow with five paid steps that fires 800 times a month is 4,000 tasks before you add AI. Use Zapier when the connection exists and speed matters. Use Make when you expect many branches and want tighter control.
GoHighLevel: automation inside the customer system
GoHighLevel belongs here because many small service businesses do not want a connector sitting between ten tools. They want one system for contacts, pipeline, SMS, email, booking, forms, and follow-up. HighLevel's official page lists Starter at $97/month, with 3 sub-accounts, unlimited contacts, unlimited users, and core features including CRM, workflows, email, SMS, and booking calendars.
The business advantage is shared data. A new lead can enter the customer list, get a text, book, move through a pipeline, and keep its source attached. That is harder when the form, CRM, calendar, and texting tool all live separately. Our GoHighLevel pricing breakdown covers the usage costs that land on top.
The trade-off is friction. In our testing, the platform takes two to three weeks before the menus feel normal. If all you need is "send a Slack alert when a form arrives," Zapier or Make is lighter.
The plan sheets in detail
| Free tier | Entry paid | Next step up | Annual discount | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Make | 1,000 credits/mo | $9/mo, 5,000 credits | Bigger credit tiers (10k up to millions) | 15% or more |
| Zapier | 100 tasks/mo | Professional from $19.99/mo | Team from $69/mo, 25 users | 33% |
| GoHighLevel | None (14-day trial) | Starter $97/mo | Unlimited $297/mo | ~17% |
Two structural notes from the July 2026 pricing pages. Make has folded its old Core, Pro and Teams lineup into a single "Make plan" whose price scales with the credit tier you choose, with a selector running from 5,000 credits to several million; the FAQ still references the legacy plan names for existing customers. Zapier hides task allowances behind the plan selector, and the Team tier's headline addition is seats and shared workspaces rather than a different automation engine.
GoHighLevel's ladder is different in kind: Unlimited at $297 exists for agencies running many client workspaces, and Agency Pro at $497 is for reselling the platform outright. A single business never needs past Starter, and the real cost driver sits in the usage meter regardless of tier. For the fuller CRM-versus-CRM decision beside this connector decision, the GoHighLevel vs HubSpot breakdown runs the same arithmetic on that pair.
What the meters count, precisely
Meters decide these bills, and each vendor counts differently.
Zapier tasks. Triggers are free; watching for a new form entry costs nothing. Failed actions are free too, only successfully completed actions consume tasks. AI steps and some connector calls consume more than one task each, at rates that vary by AI model tier. So a five-step Zap with one trigger and four actions costs four tasks per run, more if one of those actions is an AI step.
Make credits. Every module operation consumes a credit, including the trigger check in most configurations. Routers and filters shape the path but the modules on each branch bill as they run. A scenario that polls every five minutes consumes credits on the polling schedule, not just when something happens, which is the classic source of surprise Make bills. Switch scenarios to fire on demand where the app allows it.
GoHighLevel usage. Workflow actions are included in the subscription, with a class of premium actions at $0.01 per execution. The real meter is communications: about $0.0075 per SMS segment and $0.675 per 1,000 emails, so the automation is effectively free and the messages it sends are not.
A worked example: 500 leads a month
Take one standard job: a form fires, the lead lands in a sheet and a CRM, an enrichment step runs, a Slack alert posts, and a follow-up email goes out. Five working steps, 500 times a month.
On Make that is roughly 2,500-3,000 credits with sensible scheduling, inside the $9 tier with room to spare. On Zapier it is about 2,000 tasks (the trigger is free), which clears the free plan by a mile and lands in Professional territory; the exact plan depends on the task tier you buy, so price it in the selector before assuming. On GoHighLevel the workflow itself costs nothing beyond the $97 subscription, and 500 follow-up emails cost about 34 cents; the platform only makes sense if you also want the CRM, calendar and pipeline it drags along.
Run your own version of this test with your three highest-volume workflows before buying anything. The meters diverge hard at volume, and the cheapest tool for one shape of work is the priciest for another. Double the lead volume in the example and Make still fits its $9 tier while the Zapier bill steps up a plan; halve it and the free plans nearly cover the job.
AI steps: the new budget line
All three now sell AI inside the automations, priced in their native meters. Zapier bills AI actions as multiple tasks, with the multiplier depending on the model tier, so an AI-summarize step in a busy Zap can quietly double its task consumption. Make bills AI modules in credits like any other module, plus whatever the connected AI provider charges on its own key. GoHighLevel sells AI as flat add-ons instead: the AI Employee bundle at $50-97 a month per sub-account, with pay-per-use rates underneath for lighter use.
The budgeting rule is the same on all three: an automation that reads or writes text costs a different order of magnitude than one that moves fields, so count AI runs separately when you price a workflow. A tagging step that fires on every lead is cheap insurance. A drafting step that fires on every lead is a subscription of its own.
When the connector becomes the system
There is a failure mode this comparison should name: the stack where forty Zaps quietly become the CRM. Each one made sense when it was built, nobody remembers half of them, and the lead flow now depends on a chain no one can draw. Connectors are at their best moving data between systems that each own their job. When the connector starts holding the business logic (which lead goes where, who follows up, what counts as booked) it is doing a customer system's job without a customer system's visibility.
The tell is simple: if a new hire cannot be shown where a lead lives, the automation layer has become load-bearing. At that point compare the total connector spend against a platform that owns the pipeline natively; the all-in-one CRM roundup is the companion read for that decision. Rebuilding twenty small automations inside one system is a week of tedium that removes a permanent source of silent failures.
Who should skip each one
Skip Make if nobody on the team enjoys building things. The visual canvas is powerful and patient, and it rewards tinkering; a team that wants set-and-forget will leave scenarios half-built. Skip it too when every workflow you need is a simple two-app handoff, where Zapier's speed wins.
Skip Zapier if your workflows branch heavily or run at high volume, where the task meter compounds fastest, or if the monthly bill already stings at low usage. Teams that feel that pinch usually rebuild their three biggest Zaps in Make and keep Zapier for the long tail, if at all.
Skip GoHighLevel if you only need plumbing between existing tools. It is a customer system with automation inside, not a connector, and buying it for the workflows alone means paying $97 a month while ignoring most of the product. Anyone drafting copy inside those automations is better served pairing a connector with one of the AI writing tools than forcing everything into one platform.
Three budgets, mapped
Under $10 a month. Make's $9 tier, or the two free plans stacked. This budget automates a real small business if the workflows are chosen carefully: lead capture, alerts, one follow-up sequence. Its constraint is volume, not capability.
Around $50 a month. Zapier Professional at a mid task tier, or Make with a larger credit allowance, or both free plans plus one paid. This is the comfortable bracket for a marketing team automating lead flow, reporting and content handoffs across a stack of five to eight apps.
$130 and up. GoHighLevel Starter plus light usage, with a connector kept for the odd job GHL cannot reach, or a heavy Zapier/Make tier for genuinely high volume. At this spend the question changes from "which connector" to "should the customer system own the automation," and that answer depends on whether SMS, booking and pipeline live in the same place your automations do.
Your move
Your move
Write down your three highest-value repeat tasks before choosing anything. If they are simple app-to-app handoffs, test Zapier. If they branch by rules or touch many apps, price them in Make credits. If they are tied to leads, appointments, SMS, and sales stages, compare GoHighLevel against your current stack before adding another connector.
The reliability habit that outranks the tool choice
Every automation platform fails sometimes: an app changes its interface, a credential expires, a rate limit bites. What separates teams is not which tool they picked but whether anyone notices within a day. Zapier at least prices failure kindly, since failed actions do not consume tasks. The habit that matters on any of the three: route every workflow's error path to a channel a human reads, check the run history weekly for silent stalls, and give each automation an owner by name. A broken follow-up sequence does not announce itself; leads simply stop replying, and by the time someone traces it back, a month of pipeline has leaked. Fifteen minutes of monitoring habit protects more revenue than any plan upgrade.
How we checked
Plan figures come from make.com/en/pricing, zapier.com/pricing and gohighlevel.com/pricing, pulled July 10, 2026. Task-counting rules are quoted from Zapier's own pricing page; GHL communication rates are from HighLevel's published billing documentation. The worked example is arithmetic at stated volumes, not a quote, and both Make and Zapier price intermediate tiers through on-page selectors that change without notice. Treat every figure as a July 2026 snapshot.
Worth watching
AI is changing automation from "move this field there" to "read this, decide what it means, and take the next step." Start with low-risk work like tagging leads or drafting summaries before an AI step can message customers.
Email rules matter too. Any automated follow-up that sends from your domain needs the basics in place, especially SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, the records that prove your email is real. The setup is covered in our email deliverability guide.
For the broader customer-system choice, read our all-in-one CRM comparison and the AI tools topic page.
Frequently asked questions
What marketing automation platform should a small business compare first?
Compare Make, Zapier, and GoHighLevel first. Make is strongest for visual, low-cost workflows across apps. Zapier is easiest for common app connections. GoHighLevel fits service businesses that need CRM, SMS, calendar booking, and follow-up in one system.
How much do marketing automation tools cost in 2026?
Make has a free plan with 1,000 credits and a paid plan shown at $9/month for 5,000 credits. Zapier has a free plan with 100 tasks and Professional starts at $19.99/month. GoHighLevel Starter is $97/month plus usage costs for phone, SMS, email, and AI. Pricing checked July 2026.
What is a task or credit in automation software?
A task or credit is one piece of work the automation performs, such as creating a spreadsheet row, updating a contact, sending a message, or running an AI step. The bill rises when the workflow fires often or has many steps.
Do triggers count against Zapier's task limit?
No. Zapier's pricing page states triggers do not count toward the task limit, and failed actions do not count either. Only successfully completed actions consume tasks, though AI steps and certain premium actions consume more than one.
Is Make or Zapier cheaper for the same workflow?
Usually Make, on list price: $9/month buys 5,000 credits against Zapier Professional from $19.99/month. But Make charges a credit per module operation, so a branch-heavy scenario can consume credits faster than the equivalent Zap consumes tasks. Price your real workflow in both meters before deciding.
About The Memo
The daily brief on AI and marketing. What changed in AI tools, search, ads and growth, why it matters, and the move to make this week. How we work
The daily Memo
One short email each morning when something in AI or marketing actually changes, with the move to make.
Free. Every morning. Unsubscribe anytime.
Keep reading
Related briefings

Best all-in-one CRM for small business 2026
GoHighLevel, HubSpot, or ClickFunnels: which one a 1-10 person team actually runs. Real pricing, where each falls short, and how to pick by job.

Marketing attribution for small business: a simple setup
Marketing attribution for small business, explained without a data team: track where customers came from and which spending produces sales.

Best AI writing tools for marketing 2026
Jasper, Frase, and Copy.ai compared for small marketing teams: which fits which job, real 2026 pricing, and where output still needs an editor.